Monday, January 28, 2019

Review: Reservation Road

Reservation Road Reservation Road by John Burnham Schwartz
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

You are going to need chocolate. And tissues. And wine (although possibly something stronger). I did not know what this book was about before reading it, but I had read The Commoner two years ago and that sparkling gem put John Burnham Schwartz on my radar. Where he shall remain.

This book, Reservation Road, will take the wind out of you from the start. Every angle of the horror-struck, grief-ridden, and heartbroken is explored. Meticulously. I wanted to stop reading because it was just so sad, but I couldn’t. Schwartz can make a sentence sing with immaculate construction and perfect heft, and like enchanting sirens, they transfixed this reader. Page after page.

Magnificently imagined and flawlessly penned, of course.


View all my reviews

Sunday, January 27, 2019

Review: Euphoria

Euphoria Euphoria by Lily King
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

I fell into this book at 8 pm and could not climb out until the sky grew grey-pink with the light of a new day. Finished, I stood but remained rooted to the floor. I just could not move. Euphoria is that kind of book. It seized me.

Lily King makes a deep slice into the lives of three anthropologists working together along New Guinea’s Sepik River. It is fiction but meticulously researched and firmly based on Margaret Mead’s work among the Arapesh, Mundugumor and Tchambuli peoples. She was studying male/female relationships and gender roles in these New Guinea communities.  Below is an image of some of Mead's notes from the time:


Lily King’s book is raw and dark with sinister shadowing throughout. (Think: Conrad’s Heart of Darkness with less bureaucracy and politics but more human turmoil and spectacle.) I could smell the sweat of the Amo people and feel the malarial weakness and chill of the three ethnographers. Most brilliant was the juxtaposition of the drama within the tribal communities they encountered and studied, and the drama unfolding among the themselves -- three professionals, each handicapped by his own scarred soul.

Have you ever wondered what it would be like to live among people who cannot conceive of schedules (as in minutes/hours) or a people who will fling (living) twin newborn babies into a river without a thought, because twins can only mean two fathers/lovers and this is bad luck.

The story is packed with brutal, feral and even alien imagery; the reader must utterly deactivate her own moral compass and arrest all sense of right and wrong -- just to take it in. As you experience this parallel universe of sensibilities, you must also wonder how to weave it into your ideas about life on Earth. What to file this under? Beats me. It is fiction, yes, but based on very similar events, which makes it alarming and disruptive …yet wildly beautiful.

Lily King’s writing is breath-taking.

View all my reviews

Review: Lab Rats: How Silicon Valley Made Work Miserable for the Rest of Us

Lab Rats: How Silicon Valley Made Work Miserable for the Rest of Us Lab Rats: How Silicon Valley Made Work Miserable for the Rest of Us by Dan Lyons
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

In this book, Lyons introduces us to the tech guru’s world. Wow. It sounds practically pornographic in its exploitation of its workforce and its astounding, short-sighted greed. The stories of employee humiliation, degradation, and abuse are intended to shock the reader. They do.

According to Mr. Lyons, tech bosses have recast the workforce, placing clever but morally incomplete children at the helm. What do you have at the end of the day? A playground for spoiled, self-important, Silicon Valley techsperts, but a soul-crushing purgatory for employees.

Mr. Lyons is angry at the tech tyrants and the awful legacy they are creating. There is more than a hint of sour grapes in his rant-stoked stories, and this does detract somewhat from his central message. Yet, the stories are deeply disturbing. We have conferred unimaginable wealth on the tech movers and shakers. We have concentrated unprecedented power in one discipline – technology – and, according to Dan Lyons, these fascists of the IT business world are not people-persons. They are not nice.

He has true contempt for the smash-and-grab-get-rich-quick-and-to-hell-with-everyone-else technology leaders. He believes they lack vision and character and that they have no respect for the human beings working for them. He does a good job comparing current-day business moguls with the empire-builders of history and through this comparison the trajectory toward avarice and despotism in the present-day big tech startup world becomes evident.

However, he seems to cast all employees as good, hard-working people who are treated unkindly and unfairly. This can’t be so. Many of the young people who flock to the brutal environments of promising startup companies are just as half-formed as those who run the show. I think it would have been useful to devote a few paragraphs to this reality and acknowledge that some employees are intending to be disloyal users and abusers themselves. They want training, in fact.

And, boy, Lyons sure does hate Milton Friedman, at one point bemoaning the Milton Friedman “brainwashing” that has (apparently?) been inflicted on American students of economics. This is really weird. I can’t think of a single university which actually teaches Friedman’s economic theories. (Well, maybe Hillsdale?) Having the business and econ textbooks of a handful of recent college grads on my shelves, I looked over the tables of contents. Keynes is king. Keynesian economics is what American universities serve up and plenty of it. Friedman’s monetarism is the antithesis of Keynesianism and our current day IT wizards and technology entrepreneurs were almost certainly fed a steady diet of Keynesian econ. My best guess would be that they realized it was bunk.

And the continual virtue-signaling got tiresome. Given the revelations of the past two years, few can now tolerate the pretense of this. Admirably, Mr. Lyons talks about a few companies who are working to close the “access gap” in the gig economy …. there are not enough women and not enough people of color. Good call. But, when describing one company’s efforts he actually counts up the number of women and minorities in leadership, and then breaks it down by exactly how many Hispanics and exactly how many African Americans. I found this extremely awkward and a little creepy. An image of Madam Defarge from Tale of Two Cities sprung to mind, her knitting and counting and watching and plotting.

Absent was any discussion of startups companies who are reaching out to the very poor white population in Appalachia, for example, where people have been hopeless for many generations. BitSource, Interapt, Dirty Girl Coffee – there are many valiant efforts underway to lift the non-coastal, marginalized, ignored, and forgotten … out of chronic poverty. To the extent that Mr. Lyons is championing the needs of the working class, I just think he ought to include all members of this class – all of the people who struggle to gain access and to earn a living.

His overall presentation was lopsided.

By the time I got to the chapter on Social Entrepreneurship and the Social Enterprise Movement, I wasn’t sure whose ideas sounded more dangerous – those of the greedy, crazed, workaholic, technocrats or those of this author. Somehow, we went from contempt, derision and deep suspicion of the oligarch tech bosses … to actively promoting the idea that tech companies should be socially active and change the world with their ideas. Wait a minute. All previous chapters of this book told me why this is bad. Now, I guess we will magically find startups manned only by virtue-filled children. Whose virtues will they reflect, I wonder. Had this discussion been tempered with the more current research on diversity delusions and how social justice enterprises are devouring themselves, it might have been a better one.

Social entrepreneurship sounds like other people telling me what I should believe, how I should vote, where I should spend my money. Stuff like this. No thank you. The virtue-signaling propaganda from businesses in the past two years is now the downright scary stuff of group-think madness or worse – corporate greed. When Gillette tells men to be better for the sake of all womankind, while they charge women more for the exact same piece of plastic razor just because it is pink…well, no one who can read takes this (or them) seriously. Consumers know that businesses that jump on the virtue bandwagon are merely exploiting for the sake of their bottom line. I think Mr. Lyons doesn’t want this to be true, but that doesn’t make it untrue.

Lyons says the goal and responsibility of big business should be to pull people out of poverty, to share their great profits with them, and thus provide better futures for all. It is hard to argue against this. Some businesses will do this. Some won’t. I am glad he has called out the greediest profit-hogs.

A fact on which Lyons sheds light and with which we need to grapple is this: In the tech startup world, the leaders have demonstrated again and again that knowing what needs to be done is not enough to make themselves want to do it. This is a human problem and one which needs further unpacking and ongoing, apolitical analyses.

As an exposé on what the tech oligarchs are getting away with as they make millions or even billions off us, this is a very good book. As advice on how we should move forward, not so much.

View all my reviews

Saturday, January 19, 2019

Review: The Violinist's Thumb: And Other Lost Tales of Love, War, and Genius, as Written by Our Genetic Code

The Violinist's Thumb: And Other Lost Tales of Love, War, and Genius, as Written by Our Genetic Code The Violinist's Thumb: And Other Lost Tales of Love, War, and Genius, as Written by Our Genetic Code by Sam Kean
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

The Violinist’s Thumb is a captivating whirligig cruise through the jungle of genetic curiosities.

It had just enough heft for the non-scientist (like me) to feel good about learning heaps, and it had enough campy tangents to balance the instructional with the chimerical.

I am amazed at this author’s ability to perfectly balance (scientific) breadth with depth, while cleverly turning phrase after phrase. If there exists a non-fiction book-writing golden ratio, Kean achieves it here as he did in The Disappearing Spoon.

Favorite new idea I got from this book: Musicology recapitulates ontology.
Second favorite new idea I got from this book: The first beings probably were multicellular by mistake, sticky cells that couldn’t free themselves.

Caesar's Last Breath is on my February reading list!

View all my reviews

Review: An Anonymous Girl

An Anonymous Girl An Anonymous Girl by Greer Hendricks
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

This is a massively appealing story – a psychological, page-flipping thriller.

Although the reader spends all of her time trapped inside the minds of two opposing forces – the annoyingly guileless Jessica and the creepy, cagey Dr. Shields – it works, because the authors also tap into the minds of (basically) every woman. As you read, you will find yourself thinking, again and again, things like: Oh, I just knew she’d say something like that! Or maybe: Oh, right, I totally get that.

There are no profound revelations and no thunderclap moments. There were no sentences which needed unpacking or a second read-through, and I thought it was short on action yet long on clothing and makeup descriptions. As you fly through the chapters, if you are thinking ahead, you can work out what might happen next and you’ll probably be right.

Still, the book is 100% diverting. It delivered pure entertainment, hence the 4 stars!



View all my reviews

Friday, January 11, 2019

Review: The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters

The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters by Tom Nichols
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Ignorance often plays host to intolerance and they can sit together at a granite bar with a fine Merlot just as easily as they can motor down the aisles of Walmart. I think Mr. Nichols would agree with this. My uncertainty here stems from the inherent problem of an intellectual successfully writing on the dangers of anti-intellectualism. It stirs mistrust. I struggled with skepticism, I confess, but his delivery is even-handed and (dare I say it?)….knowledgeable.

Mr. Nichols gets major points for bravery, as writing a book about the dangers of ignorance is a thankless enterprise. Experts of every kind (self-professed and world renowned) are fist-pumping while the wannabes and ordinary folk might feel slightly provoked.

Medicine, engineering, science, education, construction, law, technology, …. all of these disciplines and many more are populated with trained individuals who are daily challenged by dunderheads equipped with little more than google links wanting to dismiss hard-won expertise. The Death of Expertise speaks directly to these much-abused experts.

Nichols walks the reader through all of the digital-age malefactors and makes several good points about the challenges to expertise arising from the fact that there is just too, too much information out there. All of the culprits are addressed: confirmation bias, entertainment bubbles, erroneous polls and market research, very significant mistakes experts have made in the past, and the unshakeable belief many people now hold - that their own guesses are as good as the expert’s guesses.

I devoured this book, but a few questions nagged me.

In our ideologically bifurcated culture – supported by our beloved technologies – aren’t all of our new experts and future experts thoroughly drenched in some bias, some world view, some bubble-driven philosophy? Or have they acquired a super-human power enabling them, as they studied and worked, to embrace objectivity all throughout? Do they graduate from Brown, intern at Alphabet, and shuffle around at WeWork with their Shih Tzu while maintaining a healthy respect for the non-organic farmer from Topeka? Or is the non-organic farmer from Topeka not “a real expert” to be respected?

Also, if a hypothetical Mr. Smith has witnessed the experts getting it wrong (via wars, medicines, chemicals, investments, and, yes, technology) and if these mistakes-of-expertise seriously derailed Mr. Smith’s life … then how, oh how, does this mere mortal separate his sad, expertise-driven setbacks from a permanent, enervating cynicism?

I do not think that one person’s ignorance is better than another person’s knowledge and share the same goals as Mr. Nichols: a vibrant intellectual and scientific culture and in which its citizens trust its leaders and policymakers. Truly, how can we move forward without this?

My favorite section of the book was on Repairing the Relationship. I wish half the book had been devoted to this as most are aware of how serious the problem is, but few know how to fix it.

The resentment of experts by laypeople is institutionalized. And the resentment of laypeople by experts has grown exponentially since Donald Trump was elected president. So, can mutual resentment be remediated with mutual respect, without exacting a pound of flesh from each? And, if so, how?

The headwaters from which all rejection of expertise springs can possibly be found in our culture’s loathing of the mere prospect of right vs. wrong, good vs. bad. For decades we have couched our language and coached our children to accept that everyone is different, that one person’s right is another person’s wrong, and it’s all good. No worries. Has relativism effectively “greyed-out” that part of our brains which once nimbly identified something as correct or not? Surely, it has made it much harder to separate the crack pots from the competent.

Everyone will benefit from reading this book. It is challenging. It is worth it.

View all my reviews

Sunday, January 6, 2019

Review: Little Fires Everywhere

Little Fires Everywhere Little Fires Everywhere by Celeste Ng
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

As I began Little Fires Everywhere, I thought the title of the book was explained in those first few pages. But two-thirds of the way through, as each character flared to life and the distinct humanity of each man, woman, and child ignited and blossomed just so, I felt a deeper appreciation for this cleverly couched title.

Ng does a fine job of slowly peeling back the layers of civility in this Shaker Heights, Ohio community as she carefully reveals the flawed core in each of her characters. The story had great pace; it was a swift and satisfying read with just the right number of people to track and scrutinize. You are sure to find someone to root for or someone to scorn. The central drama - the adoption of an Asian baby - was an excellent tool to guide the reader into a deep exploration of the nature of parentage and how society defines it. The situational incongruities abound; there is a veritable panorama of connect-the-dots moments and mirrored losses for the reader to capture and toy with. This author is singularly inventive in this way.

I think more action was needed - there were a few times I felt like the story was an idling engine, a vehicle in neutral gear. It would be a superb beach read, if only there were a beach....

View all my reviews

Thursday, January 3, 2019

Review: The Rise of Superman: Decoding the Science of Ultimate Human Performance

The Rise of Superman: Decoding the Science of Ultimate Human Performance The Rise of Superman: Decoding the Science of Ultimate Human Performance by Steven Kotler
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Wow. Steven Kotler has written a devilishly useful book. The Rise of Superman is about extreme athletes, their extraordinary feats, and, most importantly, the state of mind in which they are most capable of doing the impossible. The pages erupt with the astonishing ventures of these flow-drenched specimens of athletic prowess. Yet, this is much more than a book about ultimate athletic performances.

I am mom of four grown kids, wife, and homemaker of a certain age. Oh, ok, I get my senior discounts. Truthfully (don’t cringe!), I had never heard of most of the extreme sports-wizards discussed in this book. I never, ever intend to do anything as remotely dangerous or daring as these young super-humans have done. Yet, this book is packed with solid take-aways for me.

Throughout The Rise of Superman, Mr. Kotler discusses the psychology of peak performance first described as “flow” by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi in his 2008 bestseller, Flow. Well, to say that Kotler discusses Flow doesn’t really do him justice. He has ennobled Flow. Animated Flow. He has made entirely approachable the concept of Flow, so that ordinary human beings (like me and you) can understand it, embrace it, and become better because of it. If you want to be a better writer, knitter, chef, coder, hair-stylist, dancer, comedienne, biker, teacher – this book is for you. We have all experienced this wonderful state of flow – when you are doing something you love, you are doing it well, you are concentrating and pushing yourself, and time flies (or stands still) and you feel at one with the universe and with yourself. It is deeply satisfying. It is joy. Who doesn’t want more of this? Kotler is knee-deep in Mihaly’s world of Flow and he delivers it to his readers in spades.

My favorite new word from this book: autotelic
My favorite new science-y concept from this book: transient hypofrontality
My favorite quote from this book: “To really achieve anything, you have to be able to tolerate and enjoy risk. It has to become a challenge to look forward to. In all fields, to make exceptional discoveries you need risk—you’re just never going to have a breakthrough without it.”

Last but not least, I now understand the hair-raising stunts my own sons used to do regularly in our backyard. They were Goodflow Hunting. Carry on you brave souls….

View all my reviews